The NAACP is suing several major mortgage banks because the organization believes blacks have been steered in to high cost mortgage loans. The NAACP is citing the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act (HMDA) data that is collected on all mortgage applications which identifies the racial make up of mortgage applicants. A study of the data collected by the Federal Reserve by the National Community Reinvestment Coalition (NCRC) claims that blacks are more likely to have higher cost loans even when controlling for income. Click here for a full copy of the study.
As a black mortgage broker, I am going to go on record and say that this lawsuit is bunk for a number of reasons:
Lack of Data
First, the organizations completing the study are not analyzing the entire data set to come to their conclusion. HMDA data does not include the other factors that go into underwriting decisions which may also impact interest rates such as loan-to-value, credit scores, debt to income, assets, etc. While the data suggest that blacks are more likely to have higher interest rate, it does not necessarily mean that blacks are being purposely steered into higher cost loans. The first thing learned in any statistics class is that a correlation does not imply causation. In other words, just because two points are seemingly related to each other, does not mean that they cause each other. Simply pointing out that blacks are more likely to have higher interest rates while ignoring the other factors does not qualify as indepth statistical analyses in my book.
The Wealth Gap
The NAACP and the NCRC also cite that blacks with similar income are still more likely to have higher cost loans. Based on my experience, this isn’t surprising either, but hardly indicates racism. Having looked at the financial assets of hundreds of clients, I can without a doubt say that on average white borrowers tend to be better off financially and credit wise than black borrowers of similiar incomes. What this is highlighting is a generational wealth gap that is just now being resolved.
Blacks are barley one generation removed from Jim Crow laws and blatant racism. My parents are old enough to have experienced drinking out of “colored” water fountains. One of the results of our ugly past in this country is a generational wealth gap that is primarily caused by blacks being denied a lack of economic opportunity in the past. This wealth gap often times negates benefits from high incomes which I theorize is one of the reasons the data suggest that even when controlling for income that blacks are still more likely to have higher interest rates.
I deal almost exclusively with A paper borrowers and my average client probably has a household income of approaching $200,000. Nearly all of my clients are first time home buyers. A fairly large percentage of my white clients often receive gifts from their parents for down payments or already have substantial assets from inheritances and trust funds. However, in nearly $100 million of closed loans over the past several years and having a decent number of black clients, I have yet to have a black client receive a gift for a down payment from their parents. From my unscientific observation, my black clients tend to have more debts such as student loans and fewer assets available for purchases. They are also much more likely to want 100% financing. So while the incomes may be the same, the overall profile of the borrower is not.
Who is Doing the Steering?
Finally, I have to ask if it is racism if the steering into high loans is being done by other blacks? I wonder if any analyses has been done on the race of the loan officer providing the mortgage loans? HMDA does not collect data on the loan officer’s race. For the most part, mortgages are a relationship business. People often work with others they trust. It is not uncommon in this business for people to find a commonality and exploit it to the fullest. Some of the worst con artist I have seen in this business focus on working with others of like races or associations. For instance, I know of a mortgage brokerage here in Chicago that targets hispanic borrowers. Most of the loan officers are hispanic and every loan probably is pushing the barriers the maximum legal fees allowed. My guess is if one were to dig much deeper, this might be something the NAACP won’t want to admit – many of the loan officers sticking it to black consumers are also black.
While the NAACP has worked tirelessly to ensure opportunities and justice for all, I do have to say that this lawsuit is misguided and their time could be better spent elsewhere.
[...] Update 7/17/2007: As a black mortgage broker, I am going to go on record and say that this lawsuit is bunk for a numbe… [...]
Russ – You make some great points here. I too believe that the NAACP and other consumer-protection groups have plenty of legal grounds under TILA, Reg Z of RESPA and predatory lending laws to go after mortgage lenders on behalf of their constituents – and I believe they should!
The race card may just confuse an issue that needs to be resolved which is proper consumer protection and financial literacy for all Americans. I hope that even if the NAACP does not prevail on the institutionalized racism charge (which I believe they will not) that they continue to work to protect, advocate and litigate on behalf of their constituents under laws that have clearly been violated many times over during the last boom.
Great post and I am going to update and link back to this. Morgan
I wonder….if there will be an amendment to Fair Lending laws that somehow address fair treatment of all parties in obtaining a mortgage loan.
Clearly people are being treated unfairly.
The question is, how will we define “fair?”
Thanks for the comments. Predatory lending is like porn… hard to define, but you know it when you see it.
While I agree that the discrepancies in pricing across races need to be investigated, I disagree with the charges of institutional racism. I would rather see the NAACPs efforts focused on educating black consumers about finance and putting them in a better position to guard against being taken advantage of…
Been searching the web for something on this story other than just reprintings of the original AP story. Was happy to see this clear-headed response and hope it is widely read.
To dovetail on the point that raises the question of race of the loan officer, the first thing that jumped out to me was the reality that most of the subprime outlets for the lenders cited are strictly WHOLESALE not retail operations!! The loan officers (and by extention the brokerages) are almost certainly responsible for any steering of borrowers into higher cost (read: higher spread for the origiantor) financing than necessary…whether that be based on race or any other factor. What is a wholesale lender supposed to do, refuse to accept applications from African American borrowers with 700 FICOs to protect them from their greedy brokers? That would go over like a lead balloon with the NAACP, I am sure.
These lenders take the loans they are presented with by the brokers and approve what they can irrespective of race. For those lenders who also have retail operations and who also offer A/Alt-A product, perhaps there is some culpability there…but then why are BNC and Encore listed (solely wholesale subprime lenders)? And where is Countrywide in this lawsuit? The veritable kings of contacting existing borrowers to entice them into refinances?
I am disappointed in the NAACP. When are we going to start getting the civil rights business right again, we’ve been irrelevent for too long it seems we can no longer tell the bogus victim claims from true discrimination.
Thank you for your common sense. I wish the NAACP would exercise the same level of reasoning you have articulated in your entry. The great work of the previous generation of the NAACP continues to be buried as the current leadership continues to hire leaders that screw up their own financial books and file lawsuits without evaluating all the facts.
tired of hearing you black s.o.b. complaining about everything. No body owes you anything. You are all the same, LAZY and want something for nothing. Just SHUTUP ALREADY.
first of all we built america on our blood and tears. the white house bush lives in was built by blacks. america never treated blacks fairly and still don’t
hey but times have change now you white people are feeling the pain high gas, over priced housing, layoff from jobs. as i see it we are in the same lazy boat…………..
Russ,
you are right on all counts. Keep up the great blog.
Russ, I agree with you and Tyrone whole-heartedly. As a black loan originator in Flint,MI I agree that it is we that do the steering. This position is not to be taken lightly as you literally hold people’s (families’)lives in your hands and they need to be treated as we would so desire to be treated. That being said,I am growing quite weary of individuals hiding behind the curtain of ignorance. With information so readily available today on virtually any subject matter and realestate being at the forefront, how is it that sooooo many are saying “I was dooped, I didn’t know, or they told me something different.” There are more than 20 documents to go over at the closing of your loan and without the signing of all necessary docs there is no closing of the deal. ASK QUESTIONS PEOPLE! and don’t wait until you are 2 months behind and want someone to blame. For those of us who are “In the know” let us take seriously the responsibility for continuously educating ourselves and others. Ignorance is not an excuse it’s a disease.
I guess I am reading this months later, I found the site while doing a research paper on predatory lending. As a licensed real estate agent I must say that this is a problem especially in the African American community, because we don’t take the neccessary steps to educate ourselves. When an agent tries to help buyer make informed decisions they have so many people(who really are a hinderence)telling they what they should do they get confused. Then you have buyers who are trying to live beyond their means, and ignore warnings of financial ruin. People need to read the fine print!
Well I do agree minorities are being targeted, and targeted by other minorities. I am a black male and my wife is hispanic, and we saved for almost 10 months to get our required 20% downpayment, while we did that we also paid of one vehicle and one student loan. So the only debt we had going into this was a $5500 student loan, and a $19,000 car loan. We put over $26000 down on a $114,950 home and we still came out with an interest rate of 6.875. I have co-workers who bought more expensive homes and didn’t put a dime down,(they are all white), and they ended up with interest rates like 6% and 6.5%. Our total household income is about $105,000. I thought we were doing the responsible thing. And here is the real kicker. When we were in negotiating with our lender, he said as soon as we gave him a $300 check, we would lock into an interest rate of 6.50%, but when we got to the table we were told it was 6.875%, and this was a black lender I was dealing with. This is happening here in Toledo, Ohio and it is happening elsewhere, this type of practice does exist.
National Hard Money Conference hosted April 30th call 858-736-7788 for info or view 3hardmoneylenders . com